Interactive discussionStatus: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment | : Report abuse
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version      Supplement - Supplement
 
RC1: 'Interesting paper, but some work is still needed', Francesco Marra, 21 May 2017 Printer-friendly Version Supplement 
AC1: 'Response to Francesco Marra', Edouard Goudenhoofdt, 20 Jun 2017 Printer-friendly Version Supplement 
RC4: 'Thank you for the exhaustive reply. Only one point still needs attention.', Francesco Marra, 21 Jun 2017 Printer-friendly Version 
AC4: 'Response to RC4', Edouard Goudenhoofdt, 23 Jun 2017 Printer-friendly Version 
RC5: 'Thank you for the clarification', Francesco Marra, 24 Jun 2017 Printer-friendly Version 
 
RC2: 'The work is of high interest, given some more explanations and discussions are provided', Luca Panziera, 09 Jun 2017 Printer-friendly Version Supplement 
AC2: 'Response to Luca Panziera', Edouard Goudenhoofdt, 20 Jun 2017 Printer-friendly Version Supplement 
RC6: 'Second-review-panziera', Luca Panziera, 04 Jul 2017 Printer-friendly Version Supplement 
AC5: 'Response to RC6', Edouard Goudenhoofdt, 04 Jul 2017 Printer-friendly Version 
RC7: 'Thank-you for your reply', Luca Panziera, 05 Jul 2017 Printer-friendly Version 
 
RC3: 'anonymous review', Anonymous Referee #3, 12 Jun 2017 Printer-friendly Version 
AC3: 'Response to Referee 3', Edouard Goudenhoofdt, 20 Jun 2017 Printer-friendly Version Supplement