|The author have done an excellent job accounting for the referee's comments, and also relating to the closely related paper by Wessel et al. (2021) which, since the last iteration, entered discussion in TC.|
The additional discussion points, updated calculations and tables, and material presented in the Supplementary have satisfactorily addressed all raised points.
I only have a comment on the revised text: I found the added section 5.4 of the Discussion a bit long, and redundant with several aspects discussed either the end of the Introduction or in section 3.
I suggest shortening the related section, or possibly embedding it totally in section 3.
Other than that, I see no additional change necessary for the publication of this manuscript.