The topic is not particular innovative, it is not clear what is the innovation and your contribution. There are several papers about the use of UAV for DSM/DTM generation, even using the laser scanner, where the accuracy of the model is analyzed. it is necessary to deeeply investigate what is the benefit of this solution with respect of the traditional ones, even considering aspect as time of data processing, time for data acquisition, etc.
The paper is not exaustive and the comparison are quite "general", without a real reference model. The reader is not able to see the benefit of your proposal.
Data collection step is quite omitted in the paper. It is necessary to describe better that.
The english is very poor. I suggest a review by a native English speaker.
Submitted paper is not coherent with the proposed correction.
Concluding, the paper could be published, but it requires major revision. It is necessary to include a more exaustive comparison, stressing the benefit of your solution. |