Interactive discussionStatus: open (until 02 May 2017)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
[Post a comment]      [Subscribe to comment alert]      Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version      Supplement - Supplement
 
SC1: 'Welcome commentary: commentary is not enough, need to present an alternative way forward', Murugesu Sivapalan, 12 Mar 2017 Printer-friendly Version [reply]
AC1: 'Response to Prof. Sivapalan', Maik Heistermann, 24 Mar 2017 Printer-friendly Version [reply]
 
RC1: 'Referee Report', Anonymous Referee #1, 22 Mar 2017 Printer-friendly Version [reply]
AC2: 'Response to referee #1', Maik Heistermann, 24 Mar 2017 Printer-friendly Version [reply]
 
SC2: 'Quantitative concerns on the concept of Planetary Boundaries on Freshwater', Christof Lorenz, 22 Mar 2017 Printer-friendly Version [reply]
AC3: 'Response to Dr Lorenz', Maik Heistermann, 24 Mar 2017 Printer-friendly Version [reply]
 
SC3: 'Check the freshwater planetary boundary debate', Fernando Jaramillo, 25 Mar 2017 Printer-friendly Version [reply]
AC4: 'Response to Dr Jaramillo', Maik Heistermann, 27 Mar 2017 Printer-friendly Version [reply]
 
RC2: 'A feedback mechanism is missing', Hubert H.G. Savenije, 26 Mar 2017 Printer-friendly Version [reply]
AC5: 'Response to Prof Savanije', Maik Heistermann, 28 Mar 2017 Printer-friendly Version [reply]
 
RC3: 'Review of opinion paper on freshwater planetary boundary', Dieter Gerten, 09 Apr 2017 Printer-friendly Version [reply]
AC6: 'Response to Prof. Gerten', Maik Heistermann, 12 Apr 2017 Printer-friendly Version [reply]
 
SC4: 'How significant is feedback?', Chris Perry, 14 Apr 2017 Printer-friendly Version [reply]
AC7: 'Response to Dr Perry', Maik Heistermann, 20 Apr 2017 Printer-friendly Version [reply]