The authors improved their manuscript including a more in-depth analysis of the results and more explanations on the methodology and its limitation (sensitivity analysis, discussion on the ice model, …), which highly increased the quality of the manuscript. Even if the structure in this new version is clearly improved, it still has some issues, that unfortunately still make the study difficult to follow. My concern is that lot of information is spread around the text making the text often repetitive and difficult to follow, since it is often difficult to know where the information can be found. I list some advices below in order to improve the structure of the manuscript. I would recommend the manuscript for publication after some structural revisions. |